<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Future Tense - Production Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:44:21 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Our list of election-related sites by Alex Schlotzer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=1164&#038;cpage=1#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Schlotzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=1164#comment-613</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve forgotten the Your Rights at Work website - http://www.rightsatwork.com.au</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve forgotten the Your Rights at Work website &#8211; <a href="http://www.rightsatwork.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.rightsatwork.com.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our list of election-related sites by Jesse Marks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=1164&#038;cpage=1#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=1164#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Animals Australia has provided information on party policies for animal welfare and is calling on those parties without a public policy to make the public aware of their stance. We&#039;d be very happy for you to list this initiative. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Animals Australia has provided information on party policies for animal welfare and is calling on those parties without a public policy to make the public aware of their stance. We&#8217;d be very happy for you to list this initiative. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A reminder about our mission&#8230; by RNFutureTense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=297&#038;cpage=1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>RNFutureTense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=297#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Charlie,

We actually included Valcent on a program looking at vertical farming last year. See www.abc.net.au/rn/futuretense/stories/2009/2492418.htm

We spoke with Glen Kertz from the company.

Cheers 

Antony

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie,</p>
<p>We actually included Valcent on a program looking at vertical farming last year. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rn/futuretense/stories/2009/2492418.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/rn/futuretense/stories/2009/2492418.htm</a></p>
<p>We spoke with Glen Kertz from the company.</p>
<p>Cheers </p>
<p>Antony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A reminder about our mission&#8230; by Charlie Goodman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=297&#038;cpage=1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=297#comment-169</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s the topic better check out the REAL vertical farming system....

Time Magazine says Valcent&#039;s Vertical Farming Technology one of the Top 50 Best Innovations of 2009: http://bit.ly/5zDIqh

&quot;I can&#039;t think of any technology that addresses more urgent issues than Valcent&#039;s vertical farming system&quot;, says RFK Jr http://bit.ly/cPb00g

Reuters Video features Valcent&#039;s VertiCrop vertical farming system: http://bit.ly/a9p47W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s the topic better check out the REAL vertical farming system&#8230;.</p>
<p>Time Magazine says Valcent&#8217;s Vertical Farming Technology one of the Top 50 Best Innovations of 2009: <a href="http://bit.ly/5zDIqh" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5zDIqh</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t think of any technology that addresses more urgent issues than Valcent&#8217;s vertical farming system&#8221;, says RFK Jr <a href="http://bit.ly/cPb00g" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cPb00g</a></p>
<p>Reuters Video features Valcent&#8217;s VertiCrop vertical farming system: <a href="http://bit.ly/a9p47W" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a9p47W</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What year is this? by Vaudy Peng</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaudy Peng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Twentyten may be consistent but what value consistency? it is after all just a shorthand like writing BBQ. The long way is more comunicative. In Indonesia I found it conceptually hard to get used to saying nineteen thousand and ninety five ( sembilanbelas ribu sembilanpuluh lima) as is their convention. Although had no trouble if that figure was a cost in currency. So used to a meaningless 2x2 digit code that the whole-number meaning is lost. To retain meaning a diversity of expressions should be ok. The thing signified stays fixed. As with the time: 9 pm, nine o clock in the evening or 2100 EST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twentyten may be consistent but what value consistency? it is after all just a shorthand like writing BBQ. The long way is more comunicative. In Indonesia I found it conceptually hard to get used to saying nineteen thousand and ninety five ( sembilanbelas ribu sembilanpuluh lima) as is their convention. Although had no trouble if that figure was a cost in currency. So used to a meaningless 2&#215;2 digit code that the whole-number meaning is lost. To retain meaning a diversity of expressions should be ok. The thing signified stays fixed. As with the time: 9 pm, nine o clock in the evening or 2100 EST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What year is this? by RNFutureTense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>RNFutureTense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Here it is - the determination from SCOSE - the ABC&#039;s &#039;Standing Committee On Spoken English&#039;.

SCOSE guidance on the issue:

&quot;2010	twenty ten
Twenty ten is better than two thousand and ten. Subsequent dates should follow the same pattern.&quot; 

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is &#8211; the determination from SCOSE &#8211; the ABC&#8217;s &#8216;Standing Committee On Spoken English&#8217;.</p>
<p>SCOSE guidance on the issue:</p>
<p>&#8220;2010	twenty ten<br />
Twenty ten is better than two thousand and ten. Subsequent dates should follow the same pattern.&#8221; </p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What year is this? by RNFutureTense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>RNFutureTense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Checked with the ABC bods responsible for our style and pronunciation guides, they say &#039;Twenty-ten&#039; is the ABC-endorsed pronunciation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked with the ABC bods responsible for our style and pronunciation guides, they say &#8216;Twenty-ten&#8217; is the ABC-endorsed pronunciation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What year is this? by Robert Green</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=171#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I think the &#039;two thousand and...&#039; is better whilst the second part starts with a vowel (i.e. ‘twenty-o-eight’) simply due to the fact that twenty has a phonetic vowel at its end and the two conjoined are awkward to enunciate. &#039;Twenty-o-eight&#039; simply doesn&#039;t roll off the tongue!

In the previous millennium the first part finished in a phonetic consonant and therefore made enunciation much easier (e.g. &#039;fourteen eleven&#039;).

So maybe there will be a change from the previous decade&#039;s common discourse. I personally think that ‘two thousand and ten’ is not that tortuous to say and the alternative is maybe simply another example of society becoming lazy with its language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8216;two thousand and&#8230;&#8217; is better whilst the second part starts with a vowel (i.e. ‘twenty-o-eight’) simply due to the fact that twenty has a phonetic vowel at its end and the two conjoined are awkward to enunciate. &#8216;Twenty-o-eight&#8217; simply doesn&#8217;t roll off the tongue!</p>
<p>In the previous millennium the first part finished in a phonetic consonant and therefore made enunciation much easier (e.g. &#8216;fourteen eleven&#8217;).</p>
<p>So maybe there will be a change from the previous decade&#8217;s common discourse. I personally think that ‘two thousand and ten’ is not that tortuous to say and the alternative is maybe simply another example of society becoming lazy with its language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Only fools and marketing types&#8217; &#8211; Part One by Neerav</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=134&#038;cpage=1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Neerav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=134#comment-28</guid>
		<description>How about actuaries who calculate future life spans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about actuaries who calculate future life spans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Have you given up your landline? Why? by neerav bhatt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=110&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>neerav bhatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.radionational.net.au/futuretense/?p=110#comment-13</guid>
		<description>The rivers of golden revenue for telcos like Telstra from pstn (landline) calls have been drying up for years

Personally I havent made an outgoing landline call from home for years since I switched to voip. 

Voip is like thomas friedmans description of globalisation because it makes the world flat by reducing the cost of calls so much that calling a friend in sydney costs the same as chatting to business contacts in china or usa.

Landine abandonment hasn&#039;t been as prevalent as I thought it would be, mostly confined to younger generations and nomadic apartment renters but it is inevitable over time and may be accelerated by the NBN rollout</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rivers of golden revenue for telcos like Telstra from pstn (landline) calls have been drying up for years</p>
<p>Personally I havent made an outgoing landline call from home for years since I switched to voip. </p>
<p>Voip is like thomas friedmans description of globalisation because it makes the world flat by reducing the cost of calls so much that calling a friend in sydney costs the same as chatting to business contacts in china or usa.</p>
<p>Landine abandonment hasn&#8217;t been as prevalent as I thought it would be, mostly confined to younger generations and nomadic apartment renters but it is inevitable over time and may be accelerated by the NBN rollout</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
